The way things go at the VIHC board

[dave mac]

Michael Dorn forum is in full effect.

If anyone gets pissy about what gets moved there, I WILL kill them. it's a forum available to anyone who takes the time to register and is thus open to anyone. I can just see people going "but that was just a normal discussion!" Yeah, don't care.

the turdishness of VIHC strikes again. Neat, now you can still censor shit that upsets your delicate sensibilities, but pretend that you didn't.

uhg. peace.

are you this much of a fucking crybaby in real life? you literally are a joke to everyone I ask about you.

I cried about a month ago aaaaand I love jokes...

[carlsincharge]

Michael Dorn forum is in full effect.

If anyone gets pissy about what gets moved there, I WILL kill them. it's a forum available to anyone who takes the time to register and is thus open to anyone. I can just see people going "but that was just a normal discussion!" Yeah, don't care.

the turdishness of VIHC strikes again. Neat, now you can still censor shit that upsets your delicate sensibilities, but pretend that you didn't.

uhg. peace.

are you this much of a fucking crybaby in real life? you literally are a joke to everyone I ask about you.

I cried about a month ago aaaaand I love jokes...

Dave is a riddle wrapped up in an enigma. He is the tender joker

You never asked me about Dave Mac. He may be opinionated and outspoken but I would never describe him as a joke. As brash as his posts may be, I understand where he's coming from and tend to agree with the point I think he's making

[Andrew]

and tend to agree with the point I think he's making

What point do you think he's making?

[carlsincharge]

and tend to agree with the point I think he's making

What point do you think he's making?

That the way the initial post about the smoking was handled (i know that it was never permanently locked), the censoring, and the creation of the new forum, was an over sensitive reaction to the content.

[Andrew]

and tend to agree with the point I think he's making

What point do you think he's making?

That the way the initial post about the smoking was handled (i know that it was never permanently locked), the censoring, and the creation of the new forum, was an over sensitive reaction to the content.

What do you feel would have been the best solution, and what censoring are you referring to?

I feel like there's a lot of over sensitive reaction to Tyler having an over sensitive reaction.

[grind/bro]

YO DAWG WE HEARD YOU LIKE SENSITIVE REACTIONS SO WE PUT A SENSITIVE CAUSE IN YOUR THREAD SO YOU CAN BE ANGRY WHILE U POST

[dave mac]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fue90hLlj3U

this made me cry twice... I think I might be over sensitive and a cry baby.

[Andrew]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fue90hLlj3U

this made me cry twice... I think I might be over sensitive and a cry baby.

Seeing Darby Crash sad is definitely something to cry over.

[GoingBlankAgain]

Currently a 54% majority vote for "anything goes."

Hmmm.

There seemed to be a lot of people crying about how that thread Dave started last month was inappropriate for this board.

I'm curious how many of the people in that thread are in the voting majority of this poll.

A healthy number i would suspect.

I sure would like to see a comparative analysis based on IP addresses.

That would be something.

I'd also be delighted to see canon.docre's list of people who are considered good judges of character and know Dave well enough to weigh in.

I'm sure that would be something too.

Oh well, a guy can dream.

[carlsincharge]

and tend to agree with the point I think he's making

What point do you think he's making?

That the way the initial post about the smoking was handled (i know that it was never permanently locked), the censoring, and the creation of the new forum, was an over sensitive reaction to the content.

What do you feel would have been the best solution, and what censoring are you referring to?

I feel like there's a lot of over sensitive reaction to Tyler having an over sensitive reaction.

I think no reaction, no post deletion, no new forum creation, and to just let the discussion continue would have been appropriate.

[officespace]

So what's the address to the Troyler?

[reece]

123 Fake St

[Andrew]

So what's the address to the legendary castle?

P.O. Box up your butt.

[Andrew]

and tend to agree with the point I think he's making

What point do you think he's making?

That the way the initial post about the smoking was handled (i know that it was never permanently locked), the censoring, and the creation of the new forum, was an over sensitive reaction to the content.

What do you feel would have been the best solution, and what censoring are you referring to?

I feel like there's a lot of over sensitive reaction to Tyler having an over sensitive reaction.

I think no reaction, no post deletion, no new forum creation, and to just let the discussion continue would have been appropriate.

No reaction would have meant there wasn't anything needing a solution. I'm wondering what, given there was a reaction, do you feel would have been the best answer?

The only post deletion was on my part, not Tyler's, and pertained to putting content into the new forum, not an attempt at censorship. Though if you want to think of me as the guy who silenced Dave's ability to post about poo, I'm ok with that. I control the poo police state.

[carlsincharge]

No reaction would have meant there wasn't anything needing a solution. I'm wondering what, given there was a reaction, do you feel would have been the best answer?


The only post deletion was on my part, not Tyler's, and pertained to putting content into the new forum, not an attempt at censorship. Though if you want to think of me as the guy who silenced Dave's ability to post about poo, I'm ok with that. I control the poo police state.

I think the appropriate reaction would have been to let the discussion continue without moving from one forum to another.
I didn't know who or why dmac's posts were deleted, I only know they were. I was more so reacting to this: "you literally are a joke to everyone I ask about you". Where people can be upset at Dave for calling them turds, yet when someone states that Dave is a joke to everyone who they talk to about him, that is acceptable. I suppose I was having trouble seeing the difference in acceptable inflammatory content. PS I too would be interested in who thinks Dave is a joke, and whether or not they have any validity in calling him that; as well as what "literally" a joke means.

[dalamar501]

i didn't like the idea of the new forum or censorship.

but the new forum is rad and fun.

everything in there is as if things are in space.

[Hollow]

PS I too would be interested in who thinks Dave is a joke, and whether or not they have any validity in calling him that; as well as what "literally" a joke means.

Fair enough. I think he's a joke. Here's why:

He has done jack shit for me. He continues to do jack shit for me. We have never spoken, and continue to never speak. Yet he comes onto this forum stirring up shit and acting the troll. I get that he's probably doing this for laughs, but I think people who do shit like that for laughs are jokes.

Dave Mac does not have anything to do with my life other than to act the fool. Ergo, he is a joke.

I'm glad he's been good to Vancouver, though. I'm sure the shit he's done THERE is worthwhile.

[GoingBlankAgain]

PS I too would be interested in who thinks Dave is a joke, and whether or not they have any validity in calling him that; as well as what "literally" a joke means.

I think he's a joke.

We have never spoken

Are you on canon.docre's list of people he's been asking about Dave Mac?

If so, I wonder how many others have never spoken to him.

Man, do I want to see that list.

I really just like the idea that this canon.docre has been going around asking people about Dave Mac.

Trying to get a consensus before publicly decrying him as a joke.

That is truly delicious.

It literally makes me "LOL", as the kids say.

Well, maybe not a full laugh.

At least chuckle though, which is certainly happening out loud.

[ZACH ATTACK]

Who are you and why do you care about what people you don't know think about Dave Mac? The trouble with first impressions is that you only get to make one. He made a bad one and now people think he's a joke. Deal with it.

[GoingBlankAgain]

Who are you and why do you care about what people you don't know think about Dave Mac?

I find this board hilarious in an irritating kind of way.

Most of the attitudes here come across like a Sunday School forum with more profanity.

I'm curious about the Dave stuff because a lot of people here talk about not caring about him or what he thinks, yet they spend an awful lot of time posting about him and responding to him.

Or in the case of our friend canon.docre, asking people about him.

I find that very funny.

For the record I would find it equally hilarious if it were someone else in lieu of Dave.

As it stands I haven't passed judgement vocally on anything other than what I've read here, therefore my name seems inconsequential. I am basing my opinions of this board and it's posters solely on the content of this board and what has been posted. As I've said before, I'm sure there's a few people on this board who know who I am, and consequently, I know a number of the people on this board personally. The only reason I haven't said my name yet, is because I don't think it's pertinent at this stage of the game. Should that change, I will gladly introduce myself.